Below is my summation of what I would seek as remedy for all of the 2020 federal presidential elections cases pending before the court.
The cases represent the voting system and outcomes in the states of Georgia, Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. Each of these states revised their voting system just prior to this election, all had flagrant disregard to state and federal election laws, all were devoid of their state and the US Constitutions required controls by state legislatures, and all submitted Certified Votes by their Electors which were proven to be false then, and reverified hence to be invalid.
In each lawsuit the Supreme Court was petitioned in advance of the verification of Electors in the joint Houses of the Senate and prior to the selection of the winner of the 2020 election. However, the Supreme Court did not have ample time allotted to act.
Therefore at this time, in each Docket filed in the case listing a case listing, and as listed below, the remedy we are seeking is outlined below:
- That the court render a judgement that the system within each of the four (4) states is broken and therefore cannot be used in any subsequent federal election. And that further analysis of other states elections has proven that the voting system, voting machines and voting software associated has flaws that will allow outside intervention, allows for internet access, and as such has been manipulated within and outside of the United States, by foreign and American bad actors.
- That the court render a judgement that the 2020 presidential election was results had a deviation rate far greater than the 0.0008 percent allowable for these four (4) states. Factually, the tabulation results were on average 60 – 68 percentage points greater than the allowed average. Whereas the system in each state for the decision as to who the intended vote was for, was decided by individuals who were not without bias. As such, the certified ballot results are considered unacceptable.
- A presentation of these above facts prove that this federal election was fraudulent, and the selection of the president and vice president was wrongfully made.
- And regarding items 1 – 3 above, it is our request that a subsequent federal election be held within the next 6 months. During that time any current or future Executive Orders or executive actions will require a validation and verification of Donald J. Trump and Joe J. Biden.
- And, during that period, the subsequent states laws, and voting system will be rectified to ensure that the subsequent federal re-election for President and Vice President will be within the election process, the states and federal laws and the US Constitution.
The lawsuits include Powell’s Michigan case (20–815), the Trump campaign’s Pennsylvania lawsuit (20–845) and Wisconsin lawsuit (20–882), the Pennsylvania lawsuit broughtby Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.) (20–810), and Wood’s Georgia case (20–799).
Docket
for 20-799
Title:L. Lin Wood, Jr., Petitioner v. Brad
Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State, et al.
No. 20-799 Brad Raffensperger, Georgia Secretary of State,
et al. United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh
Circuit Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 11,
2021) Overall voting process and system with certification that was challenged.
President Trump won and the two Senate seats should be challenged.
SEEK REMEDY: Total change of system required.
Election in GA overturned.
Docket
for 20-810
Title:Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et
al., Petitioners v. Pennsylvania, et al.
No. 20-810 Mike Kelly, United States Congressman, et al.,
Petitioners Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Middle District Application
(20A98) for injunctive relief, submitted to Justice Alito. Pennsylvania’s
disregard of the federal constitutional framework under which state
legislatures set the rules for choosing members of Congress, subject to their
own constitutions, presents an issue affecting every American SEEK REMEDY:
Total change of system required. Election in PA overturned.
Docket
for 20-882
Title:Donald J. Trump, et al., Petitioners v.
Joseph R. Biden, et al.
No. 20-882 Donald J. Trump, et al.,
Petitioners Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due
February 3, 2021) PetitionProof of ServiceCertificate of Word
Count Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank not Wisconsin’s disregard of the
federal constitutional framework under which state legislatures set the rules
for choosing members of Congress, subject to their own constitutions, presents
an issue affecting every American
SEEK REMEDY: Total change of system required.
Election in WI overturned.
Docket
for 20-815
Title:Timothy King, et al., Petitioners v.
Gretchen Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al.
Gretchen
Whitmer, Governor of Michigan, et al. United
States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit Amicus brief of Todd C. Bank
not accepted for filing. (January 08, 2021 Jan 08 2021Pennsylvania’s
disregard for the state and federal constitutional framework under the state’s
legislature
SEEK REMEDY: Total change of system required. Election in PA
overturned.
Docket
for 20-845
Title:Donald J. Trump for President, Inc.,
Petitioner v. Kathy Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al.
Donald
J. Trump for President, Inc., Petitioner Kathy
Boockvar, Secretary of Pennsylvania, et al. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania,
Middle District Petition for a writ of certiorari filed Jan 08
2021On whether Pennsylvania failed to meet state laws regarding
selection of Electors.
SEEK REMEDY: Total change of state laws and system.
Election in PA overturned.
Reference:
New South Dakota bill seeks to nullify ‘unconstitutional’ Biden executive orders A newly proposed bill in South Dakota would nullify any executive orders from the President deemed to be “unconstitutional” by the state’s Attorney General. “The Executive Board of the Legislative Research Council may review any executive order issued by the President of the United States, if the order has not been affirmed by a vote of the Congress of the United States and signed into law, as prescribed by the 9 Constitution of the United States,” the bill states.
Supreme Court May Finally Hear Election Cases (welovetrump.com)
Docket
Search – Supreme Court of the United States
Trump Won Two-Thirds of Election
Lawsuits Where Merits Considered