By Jimmy
I have watched Dr. Jordan B. Peterson grow in popularity and what appears to be a religious awakening since his bout with the Canadian government in the use of pronouns. I have probably watched 20 -30 of his talks and interviews and I admire how he gets the upper hand in conversations. I also admire some of the people who are brazen enough to thing they can out smart him.
Today I watched a Dr. Peterson’s Podcast – Season 4 Episode 6: Gad Saad: Infectious Ideas. I was curious to hear what he thinks about the American Presidential Election of 2020. I like to get both sides of the argument, and then use that data to update my thinking and approach it from answering the mail as it were. I decided to answer Dr. Peterson’s questions he posed within this Podcast. I answered much like I answered Scott Adams on one of his Podcast with a blog titled: Mike Lindell’s Persuasion: Will you give it a fair assessment? – Old Gray Patriot
Since I have spent a significant amount of time and blogging energy on the subject, I want to answer Dr. Peterson’s question areas based on my study of the events of the election. Hopefully, Dr. Peterson will have the opportunity to review this post, and I can give him some foresight into the election as associated with his spoken reasons why he has a strong opinion that President Trump and people like me are forwarding what he sees as a conspiracy theory. I will be as to the point and as brief as possible. And I will include objective proof. I was hoping that he was more studied on the election and had an open mind. We shall see once he is enlightened. If again, he becomes privy to my renderings.
Here are the questions that Dr. Peterson noted on his Podcast regarding “Trump’s claims to having won the election by a substantial margin.” Dr. Peterson’s summation was that the following set of issues had to have occurred.
To believe that “Trump’s claims to having won the election by a substantial margin” is correct you would have to believe that the follow is true.
That the electoral system in the United States is broken and broken to such a degree that fraud is widespread and persuasive and of sufficient magnitude to move and election.
That for you to believe that people as close to President Trump as Mike Pence had turned on him.
The electoral system in the United States is not broken. Herein is proof that a minority of states, 5 states in a few tightly controlled counties, those called battleground or swing states make decisive changes to there voting system since COVID-19 to be able to game the system with an influx of votes that were not legal, ballots that were illegal, voting machines that were controlled by the internet, voting machine software that was easily manipulated, ballots that were infused into the system, lack of one person, one vote validation, lack of a chain of custody, laws changed without due process, lack of oversight by poll watchers, lack of control by the required control authority – the Legislative Branch of the State Government. There thousands of Sworn Affidavits with testimony by citizens to the fact. There are pending lawsuits for these 5 states that are on the docket on the US Supreme Court.
Additionally, the Congress gave little latitude to the states legislative branch or the People when states were challenged. Therefore, some 80M American voters have been left with no answers to who, what, why and where is the visibility and accountability to American citizens? Congress went through the process and only saw their role as buying off on the certifications, whereas history has proven that the decision of the presidency was determined at during the Electoral Process – It is not to be a rubber stamp of the choice of the left, and not of the people.
Yes the magnitude was such that President Trump could have won by much less, but he had 6M more votes than the 74M that he was allotted.
That the electoral system in the United States is broken and broken to such a degree that fraud is widespread and persuasive and of sufficient magnitude to move and election.
That for you to believe that people as close to President Trump as Mike Pence had turned on him.
Vice President Pence did not turn on the President. President Trump and we all knew that VP Pence had stated on a number of occasions that they were going to assure that EVERY LEGAL VOTE COUNTED AND THAT EVERY ILLEGAL VOTE WOULD NOT COUNT. President Trump and his supporters knew also that there was legal remedy in the Electoral System whereby those illegal votes could be removed, and that there was ample proof on hand that the minimal votes Trump needed were overwhelmingly present and the bogus certified state counts could be set aside. But, VP Pence was not about to step one foot outside of his comfort zone. And, the Pence Chief of Staff worked against MAGA “He Was Incompetent…He Failed…He’s Not a Good Guy” – VP Pence’s Chief of Staff Marc Short Prevented Recounts After January 6th per President Trump Confidant Peter Navarro Though, history has proven that there was the U.S. Constitution – Twelfth Amendment whereas the House of Representative select the President when states are contested, and there was the committee process that was used previously to select a president that Senator Ted Cruz noted whereas 2 Senators, 2 House Members and 2 Supreme Court Associate Justices take 10 days and review the subject states and recommend actions.
Here is backup data that could interest you.
The Electoral System used in the US Federal Presidential Election
First let me point out that the Electoral System is described within the US Constitution, and it takes a bevy of high-powered Constitutional attorney’s considerable time to decipher the system, review the historical precedence, and render decisions as to how the system is to proceed. That is in a normal election. In this election it was far from normal in that there were five states with some seven counties within those states whose ballot creation, ballot counting and ballot gathering process is in question.
This election having had weeks of discussion and proof of individual states election results and where each of the 5 states held many hearings such as where this expert spoke and noted that Biggest fraud’ in US history—up to 300,000 fake people voted in Arizona election and where EXHIBIT #1 – 234 Voter Fraud Affidavits from Michigan were shared with the various states legislative branches. Founders created Electoral College as a check to tyranny
You see that in a majority of these 5 states, where Constitutionally the Legislative branch has oversight and vote tabulation and certification authority, that authority was assumed by the states Governor. In these cases the Governor certified votes that were proven to be invalid – most of which are shown by Mike Lindell in Absolute Proof.
In addition, the Congress was making ready to conduct the meeting of joint of the House of Representatives and Congress to count the Electoral College votes. Again, that process is as per the US Constitution and is a regimented process – however, historically during previous presidential elections that had issues with states electoral votes, the states Certified Electoral Count was challenged. In one case in history the sitting Vice President rejected a states electoral votes and named himself the new President and in another case a commission was agreed upon composed of 2 Congressmen, 2 Senators and 2 Supreme Court Justices to decide worthiness of the states certified vote. In this case, President Trump expected that since these 5 states were in dispute, dispute to where only 12K votes were the loss in Georgia, and there were estimates of over 200K fraud, you can imagine that the president wanted such certified votes to be challenged. The entire 80M voters for President Trump wanted to have an open, fair and full election count and validation. But the Congress under the leadership of the President of Congress, VP Mike Pence took no extraneous actions and rubber stamped the certified votes we knew as invalid. So yes, President Trump knew that those bogus certifications had little more than a caucus meeting and the result was We The People were told to sit down and shut up. And that this election result is now history, and we are the radical right who are pushing a conspiracy theory.
No two states are alike has how they handle a federal election in that each state has election laws that answer the US Federal laws and US Constitution. And, due to COVID-19 some states chose to have mail in ballots, some states changed their laws within month of the election, and some states chose to manage the process with the states governor in charge, where the US Constitution is very clear about the following areas that were not controlled in the five states of Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin and Arizona.
Of the 50 states who make up the US Federal Election Commission and system as led by federal laws and the US Constitution; the election was uneventful. Uneventful except for five (5) states called the battleground or swing states. The name battleground or swing states are selected because the overall outcome of the US election was to be decided by Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona. There are seven (7) counties that came into question in those states. I have a substantial collection of links associated with the election issues related to those states at VOTER FRAUD IS NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY, IT IS A FACT!!! – Old Gray Patriot that you are welcome to review fully. And the critical elements that are in question are currently at the Supreme Court re: Supreme Court is to Review the Cases Brought Forth in regards to the 2020 Presidential Election – What Legal Remedies can We Expect? Actually, today is the day, 19 February 2021 is the day the Supreme Court pushed out the action to review these election concerns. You see, there have been over 60 cases that have worked their way through the state and federal courts to date, and Of the 22 cases that have been heard by the courts and decided on their merits, Trump and Republicans have prevailed in 15 . And contrary to the left, there has been a lack of interest in hearing any proof. You see, courts are reluctant to entertain court actions where politics are concerned. They wish to remain out of political matters. I am going to leave the subject right there.
The 50 States where 5 Swing or Battleground States held the Key – these were the vital few from the trivial many.
Of course, in America we have 50 states who make up the US Federal Election Commission and the election system as led by federal laws, and the US Constitution. Overall the election was uneventful. Uneventful except for five (5) states called the battleground or swing states. The name battleground is selected because the overall outcome of the US election was to be decided by Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona. There are seven (7) counties that came into question in those states. I have a substantial collection of links associated with the election issues related to those states at VOTER FRAUD IS NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY, IT IS A FACT!!! – Old Gray Patriot that you are welcome to review fully. And the critical elements that are in question are currently at the Supreme Court re: Supreme Court is to Review the Cases Brought Forth in regards to the 2020 Presidential Election – What Legal Remedies can We Expect? Actually, today is the day, 19 February 2021 is the day the Supreme Court pushed out the action to review these election concerns in that the Supreme Court to decide if two Trump election fraud cases can proceed this month You see, there have been over 60 cases that have worked their way through the state and federal courts to date, and Of the 22 cases that have been heard by the courts and decided on their merits, Trump and Republicans have prevailed in 15 There has been a lack of interest in the courts for hearing any proof. You see, courts are reluctant to entertain court actions where politics are concerned. They wish to remain out of political matters. The left would rather have you believe there was no proof and for us to just “sit down and shut up”. However, Trump Won Two-Thirds of Election Lawsuits Where Merits Considered and, even though the Supreme Court pushed these critical decisions until after the election, and there is wonderment as to what legal remedy could be decided weeks after Biden has started giving America over to the CCP, there is hope and I have identified recommended remedies herein: Supreme Court is to Review the Cases Brought Forth in regards to the 2020 Presidential Election – What Legal Remedies can We Expect?
Concerning the issues related to those five states they are specific about controls that are required and the generation, control and reporting of ballots. The critical elements of concern with the Ballot Tabulation part of the process in that: a) the voter equipment which is used in 30 of the 50 states can be manipulated: b) the equipment counts fractional votes, c) the system uses a rank choice algorithm, d) the system is connected to the internet, which e) when connected to the internet the chain of custody is very difficult if not impossible to maintain. And, when you select a voting system which cannot be certified then you do not have proof that your election is valid. NO PROOF EXISTS except a proof of no confidence. And when you are verifying an election if the administrators cannot certify the equipment at the outset, cannot or will not keep a chain of custody, has a system that counts fractions of votes, has a rank choice algorithm then we the people cannot trust the outcome and validate the outcome. NO PROOF EXISTS except the proof of no confidence, and a rank choice algorithm whereby one party gets less than ‘one person, one vote’ is evident. This is the case in the five states as shown by Renowned Mathematician Edward Solomon Determines the 2020 Election Results at a Precinct Level Are “Impossible” and “Cannot Occur Naturally” The results of the 2020 election are simply not possible. When looking at the precinct level, mathematician Edward Solomon says computers must have used an algorithm to change the results.
- The Palmieri Report Predicts Over 300 Electoral Votes For Trump
- The Central City News shows the results gathered by the New York Times of voter fraud the night of the election via ballot returns
- MUST READ: Democrats Were ONLY Able to “Win” in 2020 By Breaking Chain of Custody Laws in EVERY SWING STATE
- The Navarro Report Volume 3 shows votes that were stolen in the battleground states
- | How the Election Was Stolen in GeorgiaCentral City News For those who do not believe the truth. Here is NTY data shared by a Louisianan agency.| How the Election Was Stolen in GeorgiaCentral City News
That is a large data dump, but much more is found in Mike Lindell’s website: www.MichaelJLindell.com Mike is CEO and inventor of My Pillow @ MyPillow.com. Mike has invested over $3M of his on money to wake up America to the fraud. Yes, a pillow salesman wants to wake up America! Mike’s results show to be very close to the figures I have arrived at: Trump won by 79.9M votes to Biden’s 69M votes. It is as you say below Dr. Peterson a sufficient magnitude to move an election. It is estimated that within these 5 states 5M votes were created or moved from Trump to Biden. In foreign countries, with China leading, there were 5M votes moved from Trump to Biden.
- Mike Lindell: Absolute Proof of how the Election was Stolen – Old Gray Patriot
- (67) Russ Ramsland, of Allied Security Operations Group, joins me to talk Election Fraud | 10.28.20 – YouTube
- The HAMMER/SCORECARD Whistleblower: CIA Alters Voting Machine Results – Old Gray Patriot
- FBI and Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency alerts about Iranian hackers targeting election-related systems, the Homeland Security Department designation of election infrastructure as critical infrastructure
- Trump Won Two-Thirds of Election Lawsuits Where Merits Considered
Reference:
One of the cases before the Supreme Court
Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
FacebookLinkedInTwitterEmailPrintFriendlySharePending petition
Issues: (1) Whether the Wisconsin Elections Commission and local election officials violated Article II, Section 1, clause 2 of the Constitution and the 14th Amendment’s guarantee of equal protection during the 2020 presidential election by implementing unauthorized absentee voting practices in disregard of the Wisconsin Legislature’s explicit command that absentee voting must be “carefully regulated” and that absentee ballots cast outside of the legislature’s authorized procedures “may not be counted;” (2) whether this court should declare the Wisconsin election unconstitutional and void under Article II and thus failed under 3 U.S.C. § 2 and allow the Wisconsin Legislature to appoint its electors; and (3) whether federal courts may rely on the doctrine of laches to avoid reviewing electors clause or equal protection claims arising after absentee balloting began or which could not have reasonably been brought before absentee balloting commenced. Trump v. Wisconsin Elections Commission – SCOTUSblog